<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;m Scared Of Getting A Virus &#8211; What Sort Of Sites Should I Be Wary Of?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.security-faqs.com/im-scared-of-getting-a-virus-what-sort-of-sites-should-i-be-wary-of.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.security-faqs.com/im-scared-of-getting-a-virus-what-sort-of-sites-should-i-be-wary-of.html</link>
	<description>Security FAQs - answers to common questions about antivirus and other infosec issues.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:39:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.security-faqs.com/im-scared-of-getting-a-virus-what-sort-of-sites-should-i-be-wary-of.html/comment-page-#comment-981</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scamtypes.com/?p=11941#comment-981</guid>
		<description>I agree that Google scans the pages but does WOT really do that? I thought they relied purely on user ratings??

I have to confess to being in the dark over white hat SEO, let alone black hat, so I really need to do some reading on that subject. I know WHAT these guys are doing with malicious search results but I&#039;d love to understand HOW.

My kids use the free version of AVG which flags up search results and its nothing like UAC - there are just ticks, etc next to the website links - I personally don&#039;t find that intrusive in any way - but it sure is helpful.

Thanks for taking the time to write such comprehensive comments Gryffyn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Google scans the pages but does WOT really do that? I thought they relied purely on user ratings??</p>
<p>I have to confess to being in the dark over white hat SEO, let alone black hat, so I really need to do some reading on that subject. I know WHAT these guys are doing with malicious search results but I&#8217;d love to understand HOW.</p>
<p>My kids use the free version of AVG which flags up search results and its nothing like UAC &#8211; there are just ticks, etc next to the website links &#8211; I personally don&#8217;t find that intrusive in any way &#8211; but it sure is helpful.</p>
<p>Thanks for taking the time to write such comprehensive comments Gryffyn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gryffyn</title>
		<link>http://www.security-faqs.com/im-scared-of-getting-a-virus-what-sort-of-sites-should-i-be-wary-of.html/comment-page-1#comment-980</link>
		<dc:creator>Gryffyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scamtypes.com/?p=11941#comment-980</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t remember where WOT and Google get their website rating data, but it may be the same source (or similar).  They&#039;re starting to actively scan the scripts and content of the pages and do actual scanning and not just rely on people&#039;s ratings.  So that&#039;s something good.

As for black hat SEO.. no real recommendations.  People just need to know that the algorithms the search engines use to figure out what&#039;s most relevant to your search can be exploited by the bad guys to get malware sites high on the rankings.  If you&#039;re looking for news on &quot;balloon boy&quot;, try the links that come up from CNN, newspaper websites, TV news websiitess..  watch out for weird looking domain names with keywords you&#039;re searching for in the filename.

That and the standard precautions when it comes to websites.  Run antivirus/antimalware (plenty of good free ones out there.. AVG, Panda, Microsoft)..  if you run Firefox, consider running the NoScript addon.  If you&#039;re annoyed by Windows Vista/7 UAC, then it&#039;ll probably annoy you too.  But it&#039;s a small price to pay for security.  It&#039;s really just the digital version of looking both ways before crossing the street.  Takes a fraction of a second and keeps everyone safe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t remember where WOT and Google get their website rating data, but it may be the same source (or similar).  They&#8217;re starting to actively scan the scripts and content of the pages and do actual scanning and not just rely on people&#8217;s ratings.  So that&#8217;s something good.</p>
<p>As for black hat SEO.. no real recommendations.  People just need to know that the algorithms the search engines use to figure out what&#8217;s most relevant to your search can be exploited by the bad guys to get malware sites high on the rankings.  If you&#8217;re looking for news on &#8220;balloon boy&#8221;, try the links that come up from CNN, newspaper websites, TV news websiitess..  watch out for weird looking domain names with keywords you&#8217;re searching for in the filename.</p>
<p>That and the standard precautions when it comes to websites.  Run antivirus/antimalware (plenty of good free ones out there.. AVG, Panda, Microsoft)..  if you run Firefox, consider running the NoScript addon.  If you&#8217;re annoyed by Windows Vista/7 UAC, then it&#8217;ll probably annoy you too.  But it&#8217;s a small price to pay for security.  It&#8217;s really just the digital version of looking both ways before crossing the street.  Takes a fraction of a second and keeps everyone safe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.security-faqs.com/im-scared-of-getting-a-virus-what-sort-of-sites-should-i-be-wary-of.html/comment-page-#comment-979</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scamtypes.com/?p=11941#comment-979</guid>
		<description>You make a good point about black hat SEO techniques Gryffyn, and thats something I&#039;ve been meaning to educate myself about - can you recommend any reading on that topic?

As for your tips, I quite agree that Firefox is the browser of choice for those who are concerned about security and I use it myself.

The link checking feature of AVG is certainly useful and is possibly the main reason why 2 of my 3 kids&#039; computers have that particular antivirus program on them as it has helped them avoid some potentially suspect sites without doubt.

MyWot also offer a good service though I do wonder how effective it is for sites that have perhaps only received one or two reviews, be they negative or otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make a good point about black hat SEO techniques Gryffyn, and thats something I&#8217;ve been meaning to educate myself about &#8211; can you recommend any reading on that topic?</p>
<p>As for your tips, I quite agree that Firefox is the browser of choice for those who are concerned about security and I use it myself.</p>
<p>The link checking feature of AVG is certainly useful and is possibly the main reason why 2 of my 3 kids&#8217; computers have that particular antivirus program on them as it has helped them avoid some potentially suspect sites without doubt.</p>
<p>MyWot also offer a good service though I do wonder how effective it is for sites that have perhaps only received one or two reviews, be they negative or otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gryffyn</title>
		<link>http://www.security-faqs.com/im-scared-of-getting-a-virus-what-sort-of-sites-should-i-be-wary-of.html/comment-page-1#comment-982</link>
		<dc:creator>Gryffyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scamtypes.com/?p=11941#comment-982</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s also worth noting that almost any topic that is hot at the moment may fall victim to &#039;black hat SEO&#039; practices that get malware infected sites listed high whenever someone searches for whatever the hot news topic is.

This also goes for everyday things may search for frequently.  In the past &quot;screensavers&quot; and &quot;lyrics&quot; have lead to sites that may, indeed, provide screensavers and lyrics, but may also be serving out drive-by malware (very little effort to get infected) or sites that take advantage of some of the many flaws found recently in Flash or Adobe Reader.

Some tips:

1. Use Firefox.  This goes beyond anti-Microsoft snobbery.  The newer editions of Firefox actually tell you if you&#039;re running an old version of Flash or other vulnerable plugins.

2. Use Google for search. Again, this is no anti-Microsoft propaganda... Google will warn you if you click on a link that leads to a site that has been reported as potentially hostile.
(Apparently Google Chrome uses the same anti-malware check that Google does.. more info here:  http://www.ditii.com/2009/10/31/google-chromes-red-alert-message-google-anti-malware-process/ )

3. Consider using an antivirus that includes link checking (like AVG) and/or install something like WOT (Web of Trust): http://www.mywot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s also worth noting that almost any topic that is hot at the moment may fall victim to &#8216;black hat SEO&#8217; practices that get malware infected sites listed high whenever someone searches for whatever the hot news topic is.</p>
<p>This also goes for everyday things may search for frequently.  In the past &#8220;screensavers&#8221; and &#8220;lyrics&#8221; have lead to sites that may, indeed, provide screensavers and lyrics, but may also be serving out drive-by malware (very little effort to get infected) or sites that take advantage of some of the many flaws found recently in Flash or Adobe Reader.</p>
<p>Some tips:</p>
<p>1. Use Firefox.  This goes beyond anti-Microsoft snobbery.  The newer editions of Firefox actually tell you if you&#8217;re running an old version of Flash or other vulnerable plugins.</p>
<p>2. Use Google for search. Again, this is no anti-Microsoft propaganda&#8230; Google will warn you if you click on a link that leads to a site that has been reported as potentially hostile.<br />
(Apparently Google Chrome uses the same anti-malware check that Google does.. more info here:  <a href="http://www.ditii.com/2009/10/31/google-chromes-red-alert-message-google-anti-malware-process/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ditii.com/2009/10/31/google-chromes-red-alert-message-google-anti-malware-process/</a> )</p>
<p>3. Consider using an antivirus that includes link checking (like AVG) and/or install something like WOT (Web of Trust): <a href="http://www.mywot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mywot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
