<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Types Of Social Networking Scam &#8211; #5 Spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.security-faqs.com/5-types-of-social-networking-scam-5-spam.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.security-faqs.com/5-types-of-social-networking-scam-5-spam.html</link>
	<description>Security FAQs - answers to common questions about antivirus and other infosec issues.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:14:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.security-faqs.com/5-types-of-social-networking-scam-5-spam.html/comment-page-1#comment-1332</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scamtypes.com/?p=3315#comment-1332</guid>
		<description>This has become a pretty regular thing on social networking sites, especially Facebook. I can&#039;t tell you how many times I&#039;ve seen a wall post or message from a friend that was so obviously a sad attempt at spamming.

To help combat this type of scam (and most other forms of spam), I&#039;d like to invite you and your readers to try out our new service, OtherInbox.

When signing up, each user gets their own domain name (user.otherinbox.com) and they use that to sign up for their various newsletters and online services (facebook@user.otherinbox.com, mediapost@user.otherinbox.com, etc.)

Your inbox is automatically organized and folders are created for each address, allowing you to seperate these emails from your work or personal account. In doing this, you can not only keep these social networking scams seperate from your important correspondances, but you can also locate, manage and eventually block other sites that are spamming you.

We are in private beta, but you and your readers can sign up here:

http://beta.otherinbox.com/signup/scamtypes

I hope you enjoy trying us out, and I look forward to reading any ideas or comments you may have.

~The OtherInbox Team</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has become a pretty regular thing on social networking sites, especially Facebook. I can&#8217;t tell you how many times I&#8217;ve seen a wall post or message from a friend that was so obviously a sad attempt at spamming.</p>
<p>To help combat this type of scam (and most other forms of spam), I&#8217;d like to invite you and your readers to try out our new service, OtherInbox.</p>
<p>When signing up, each user gets their own domain name (user.otherinbox.com) and they use that to sign up for their various newsletters and online services (facebook@user.otherinbox.com, <a href="mailto:mediapost@user.otherinbox.com">mediapost@user.otherinbox.com</a>, etc.)</p>
<p>Your inbox is automatically organized and folders are created for each address, allowing you to seperate these emails from your work or personal account. In doing this, you can not only keep these social networking scams seperate from your important correspondances, but you can also locate, manage and eventually block other sites that are spamming you.</p>
<p>We are in private beta, but you and your readers can sign up here:</p>
<p><a href="http://beta.otherinbox.com/signup/scamtypes" rel="nofollow">http://beta.otherinbox.com/signup/scamtypes</a></p>
<p>I hope you enjoy trying us out, and I look forward to reading any ideas or comments you may have.</p>
<p>~The OtherInbox Team</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.security-faqs.com/5-types-of-social-networking-scam-5-spam.html/comment-page-#comment-1335</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 01:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scamtypes.com/?p=3315#comment-1335</guid>
		<description>My point exactly!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point exactly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cookie Info</title>
		<link>http://www.security-faqs.com/5-types-of-social-networking-scam-5-spam.html/comment-page-1#comment-1333</link>
		<dc:creator>Cookie Info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 07:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scamtypes.com/?p=3315#comment-1333</guid>
		<description>Yep, that&#039;s true. I remember how successful were first viruses sending e-mails to contacts from outlook. You know sender, you trust him. And you don&#039;t fall into spam filters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, that&#8217;s true. I remember how successful were first viruses sending e-mails to contacts from outlook. You know sender, you trust him. And you don&#8217;t fall into spam filters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.security-faqs.com/5-types-of-social-networking-scam-5-spam.html/comment-page-#comment-1334</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scamtypes.com/?p=3315#comment-1334</guid>
		<description>Fair comment but targeted spam would be far more effective wouldn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair comment but targeted spam would be far more effective wouldn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cookie Info</title>
		<link>http://www.security-faqs.com/5-types-of-social-networking-scam-5-spam.html/comment-page-1#comment-1340</link>
		<dc:creator>Cookie Info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scamtypes.com/?p=3315#comment-1340</guid>
		<description>Do you really think it isn&#039;t done automatically? I think it&#039;s better for spammers to send 1 million random mails than spend time on reading one&#039;s profiles and send 10 mails.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you really think it isn&#8217;t done automatically? I think it&#8217;s better for spammers to send 1 million random mails than spend time on reading one&#8217;s profiles and send 10 mails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
